Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | yrevnoc | 11-3 | None |
Izzet Prowess | rastaf | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12774541 |
Izzet Prowess | florian lindhoudt | 10-4 | None |
Izzet Prowess | kazuya murakami | 8-4 | None |
Mono-Red Aggro | kazuto fukutoku | 7-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | rintaro honda | 7-5 | None |
Boros Burn , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Bounce , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Big Score ranks #3838 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 75%).
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Big Score is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 2.81 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Big Score has a win rate of 56.2%, making it 17.4% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Goblin Electromancer | Creature — Goblin Wizard | 5 | 77.9% | 2 |
Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 5 | 74.0% | 3 |
Haughty Djinn | Creature — Djinn | 7 | 70.2% | 3 |
Slip Out the Back | Instant | 5 | 67.5% | 2 |
Mind Stone | Artifact | 6 | 63.2% | 2 |
Consider | Instant | 11 | 62.4% | 3 |
Storm-Kiln Artist | Creature — Dwarf Shaman | 7 | 61.6% | 2 |
Narset's Reversal | Instant | 6 | 60.8% | 2 |
Play with Fire | Instant | 9 | 60.4% | 3 |
Thirst for Discovery | Instant | 10 | 58.8% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Big Score than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 2 | 5 | 88.5% | 56.3% | +32.2% |
Haughty Djinn | Creature — Djinn | 3 | 6 | 85.7% | 61.3% | +24.5% |
Strike It Rich | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 71.4% | 53.3% | +18.1% |
Time Warp | Sorcery | 5 | 5 | 76.5% | 58.7% | +17.8% |
Play with Fire | Instant | 1 | 9 | 73.5% | 57.5% | +15.9% |
The Celestus | Legendary Artifact | 3 | 7 | 72.0% | 58.2% | +13.8% |
Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 69.2% | 56.7% | +12.5% |
Consider | Instant | 1 | 10 | 68.4% | 56.9% | +11.5% |
Thirst for Discovery | Instant | 3 | 8 | 70.6% | 59.3% | +11.2% |
Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 9 | 67.4% | 56.5% | +10.9% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | 43 | 4.4% | 43.0% |
Jeskai Oculus | 23 | 3.1% | 38.8% |
Mono-Red Aggro | 6 | 1.4% | 36.8% |
Temur Otters | 1 | 0.3% | 50.0% |
Goblins | 1 | 2.3% | 50.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.